Lunair's reviews / Literary fiction

The Secret History

by Donna Tartt

The Secret History makes a murder less disturbing than the exquisite ease with which its students learn to excuse one.

The Secret History is at its sharpest when you catch yourself wanting these dreadful people to get away with it.

Tartt's glamorous academic rot led me to a much less flattering question: why did I find it glamorous at all? The book knows how quickly a beautiful room and an impressive vocabulary can make cruelty seem like a complicated moral position. I underlined nothing. I did stare into the middle distance after closing it, which is a less portable recommendation but an honest one.

Here is my verdict early: it is magnificent, frequently funny, and at times wilfully overfed. I love the confidence of a novel that tells you its crime up front and then makes you dread the ordinary conversations around it. I also wanted someone to confiscate about fifty pages from the middle. These are compatible feelings. Literary devotion should leave room for a pencil.

The premise (no spoilers past the opening disclosure)

Richard Papen arrives from California at Hampden College in Vermont and is drawn into a small, exclusive group studying classics under a charismatic professor. Henry Winter, brilliant and unnervingly composed, exerts his own pull within that circle. Their shared hunger for a life above the mundane pushes them across a moral boundary. The opening tells us that one of their number will die. The rest is the terrible business of understanding how people who think themselves exceptional come to believe ordinary rules are beneath them.

That is enough to know. You do not need a family tree, a glossary of Greek, or advance notice of every bad decision. The central invitation is simple: stand close enough to this group to feel its warmth, then notice what that warmth costs.

What works

The decision to reveal a death at the start is a superb piece of structural cheek. Most mysteries invite you to chase the culprit. Tartt makes the crime a fixed point and shifts the suspense to character. Why does Richard stay? How does a person gradually adjust the size of a permissible wrong? You can feel the moral measurements changing while everyone keeps speaking in full sentences. That is more frightening than a surprise at the end of a chapter.

Richard's first-person gaze gives the book its essential distortion. He wants in, and desire makes him an unreliable curator of other people. The group looks enchanted partly because he keeps polishing the glass. Tartt lets us enjoy the polish while leaving enough fingerprints to question it. I found myself reading the gaps between what Richard notices and what he is prepared to judge. He can describe an atmosphere with astonishing precision and still fail the smaller test of recognising when an atmosphere is doing his thinking for him.

The prose works by accumulation. A small social signal, a change in temperature, a pause at the table: none has to announce its importance. Then the weight of all those details becomes unbearable. Tartt is unusually good at making intellectual intimacy feel like a form of weather. You enter the circle and the climate changes. Her long passages of talk and observation give the relationships room to become habits, which is why their eventual pressure feels earned rather than arranged.

And the comedy matters. These students have built an entire private religion around their own taste, yet they remain vulnerable to petty irritation and embarrassment. The air of grandeur keeps being punctured by recognisable human vanity. A less confident book would protect its beautiful monsters from looking ridiculous. Tartt knows that ridicule can make them more dangerous, because you forgive a person once you have laughed at them. There is the trap, laid out in excellent prose.

What's polarising

The same patient attention that makes the circle persuasive can make the middle feel like a very expensive dinner where nobody will bring the bill. Conversations circle a problem; Richard circles his friends; we circle Richard. I admire the pressure this creates, but I did sometimes feel the author testing how long an atmosphere can stand in for movement. If you need a clean sequence of clues and revelations, you will become restless. The book is a psychological novel wearing a thriller's coat, and the coat is sometimes left on the chair.

You may also find Richard's reverence maddening. Good. The danger is that the novel's surfaces can be so pleasurable that its criticism of privilege and exceptionalism gets mistaken for an endorsement. Tartt gives us access to the fantasy, not immunity from it. Still, readers who need a firm moral handrail may dislike how long she lets the attraction breathe. She trusts you to feel both the seduction and the stink. I think that trust pays off; it is not a comfortable way to travel.

There is a related distance in the character work. The students are vivid as a collective before they are equally knowable as individuals. For me, that imbalance is part of Richard's fascination: he has entered a room full of symbols and must slowly confront the people inside them. For another reader it will feel cold. Do not come looking for a found family to take home. You would have to change the locks.

The Henry Winter of it

Henry is a useful test of your own susceptibility. He carries learning as if it were a permit to ignore other people's limits. His composure has real dramatic force because it gives everyone else a place to deposit their panic. I understood why Richard is impressed. I also wanted to see someone ask Henry a question he could not answer with authority and a perfectly timed silence.

What interests me is the distance between competence and wisdom. Henry can command a room, but command is not care. Tartt makes that distinction increasingly hard to avoid without flattening him into a villain who explains himself. The appeal is part of the indictment. If you find yourself wanting a redeeming romance to solve him, this is probably the moment to remember what sort of book you are holding.

Spice and heat

At 2 of 5, behind closed doors, the sexual material is peripheral rather than the engine of the story. This is literary suspense with tangled desire, not a romance promising emotional repair. The heat lies mostly in proximity, secrecy, and the need to be chosen by a group. Treat any romantic charge as part of the power struggle, not a guarantee that anyone will behave well.

Content note: murder and violence, substance misuse, incest references, and suicidal thoughts. The book's appeal does not require making any of these things elegant. If those subjects are a hard boundary, believe that boundary.

Who it's for

Read this if you like your campus novels lush, morally unsparing, and willing to let a conversation do the work of a chase scene. Read it if you have ever felt briefly cleverer just for standing near clever people, then gone home and wondered what you agreed to. You will probably enjoy the way Tartt turns aesthetic taste into a liability.

Skip it for now if you need the central relationship to be a healthy romance or the mystery to move briskly from clue to clue. There is pleasure here, but it is the pleasure of watching a locked room discover that it has no lock on the inside. Bring patience. Leave your admiration for brilliant men somewhere you can find it again.

Books like The Secret History

  • The Bellwether Revivals by Benjamin Wood: a Cambridge outsider enters a privileged circle led by a dazzling, troubling mind, with music in place of classics.
  • The Likeness by Tana French: an investigation becomes a study of how badly someone might want to belong to an intimate, sealed household.
  • Bunny by Mona Awad: another outsider encounters an exclusive academic clique, though Awad swaps Tartt's controlled chill for surreal, vicious comedy.
  • The Truants by Kate Weinberg: an English campus, a magnetic teacher, and young people who mistake attention for safety.

Start with Wood if Henry's intellectual authority was the part that unsettled you. Try Awad if you wanted the social absurdity turned up until the walls began to move. None will give you this exact book again. That is a compliment to Tartt, and a mercy to everybody who might otherwise enrol at Hampden.

Finished the book and not ready to leave? Henry Winter is waiting on Fictora.

Talk to Henry Winter